SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY OF INVASIVE DUCTAL BREAST CANCER

Keywords: invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast, degree of differentiation, morphology, scanning electron microscopy, microvilli

Abstract

Aim. Establishing the surface characteristics of ductal breast cancer of different degree of differentiation and different histological structure of the invasive component in scanning electron microscopy.

Material and Methods. The results of the study of invasive ductal breast cancer using light and scanning electron microscopy were analyzed. The degree of malignancy was determined according to a modified scheme of P. Scarff, H. Bloom and W. Richardson. Electron microscopic features of the cell surface of invasive ductal breast cancer during this study were compared in each case with its histological structure and degree of malignancy G.

Results and Discussion. Histologically, tubular, trabecular, solid, alveolar structures and discrete (single) groups of tumor cells were diagnosed in the infiltrative component of invasive ductal breast carcinoma. In terms of the surface configuration of tumor cells, we have identified three cell variants. The first variant was characterized by the presence in most tumor cells numerous asymmetric microvilli with diffuse or focal distribution on the cell surface and was prevailed in the tubular structures of the infiltrative component of ductal breast carcinoma of G1 grade (p<0,05). The second variant of the surface configuration was characterized by a small number of asymmetric microvilli scattered throughout the cell surface and was diagnosed in a solid and trabecular invasive component of malignancies G2 and G3 grades. The third variant was characterized by the absence of microvilli on the surface in most tumor cells and was prevailed in the alveolar structures of the invasive component of G2 and G3 grades. It was found that the decrease in the grade of histological differentiation of invasive ductal breast cancer is associated with a decrease or absence of asymmetric microvilli on the cell surface. Tumors classified as G2 showed a wide range of surface configurations of cancer cells; in 75% [27,96-99,89] of cases G3 carcinoma was characterized by the absence of microvilli on the surface in most tumor cells, i.e., there was a III variant surface configuration of cells.

Conclusions. Scanning electron microscopy makes it possible to provide information in a nanometer scale about the surface features of tumor cells, and the identification of phenotype features between tumor cells can be prognostically important in the course of breast cancer.

References

National cancer institute/National institutes of health/Department of health and human services, NIH, 2006. https://www.nih.gov/about-nih/what-we-do/nih-almanac/national-cancer-institute-nci

Deisboeck TS, Stamatakos GS. Multiscale cancer modeling, Chapman Hall/ CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 2011, 500 p., 113 B/W Illustration.

Kwabi-Addo B, Lindstrom TL. Cancer causes and controversies, Praeger, Barbara, Calif, USA, 2011, 241 p.

Weinberg R. The biology of cancer, Garland Science, New York, NY, USA, 2006. 850 p. ISBN: (hardcover) 9780815340782

Breast Cancer. WHO, 2021. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/breast-cancer

Bulletin of national cancer registry of Ukraine (English). (2020). Cancer in Ukraine, 2018-2019. Ukrainian cancer registry statistics, Vol.21 "Cancer in Ukraine", 2018-2019.

Chand P, Garg A, Singla V, Rani N. Evaluation of immunohistochemical profile of breast cancer for prognostics and therapeutic use. Niger J Surg. 2018 Jul-Dec; 24(2): 100-106. doi: 10.4103/njs.NJS_2_18

Gould VE, Jao W, Battifora H. Ultrastructural analysis in the differential diagnosis of breast tumors. The significance of myoepithelial cells, basal lamina, intracytoplasmic lumina and secretory granules. Path. Res. Pract. 1980, 167, 45-70. doi: 10.1016/S0344-0338(80)80181-6.

Spring-Mills E and Elias JJ. Cell surface changes associated with human breast cancer. Scanning Electron Microsc. 1976;11: 1-9.

WHO Classification of tumors editorial board, ed. WHO classification of tumors, 5th edition - Breast tumors. Lyon: International agency for research on cancer 2019 DOI: 10.1111/his.14091

Elston CW, Ellis IO. Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology. 1991;19: 403-10.

Tuk B, Corrales D. Scanning electron microscopy in gastric adenocarcinoma and intestinal metaplasia. Rev Biol Trop. 1986 Nov; 34(2): 167-70. PMID: 3423334

Toshiyuki Т, Hasegawa F, Michishita M, Sasaki N et al. Electron microscopic analysis of different cell types in human pancreatic cancer spheres. Oncology Letters. 2018; 15: 2485-2490. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2017.7554

Wang NS. The surface appearance of some lung tumors, mesothelioma and their precursor lesions. Scanning Electron Microsc. 1980; III: 79-88.

Gao Z, Liu R, Ye N, Liu C. et al. FOXO1 inhibits tumor cell migration via regulating cell surface morphology in non-small cell lung cancer cells. Cell Physiol Biochem 2018; 48: 138-148. https://doi.org/10.1159/000491670

Trump BF, Heatfield BM, Phelps PC, Sanefuji H, Shamsuddin AK. Cell surface changes in preneoplastic and neoplastic epithelium. Scanning Electron Microsc. 1980; III: 43-60.

Bloom HJ, Richardson WW. Histological grading and prognosis in breast cancer; a study of 1409 cases of which 359 have been followed for 15 years. Brit. J. Cancer 1957; 11: 359-377.

Hartveit F. Prognostic typing in breast cancer. Brit. Med. J. 1973; 4: 253-257.

Published
2021-12-23
How to Cite
Volos, L., Datsyuk, Y., & Dudash, A. (2021). SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY OF INVASIVE DUCTAL BREAST CANCER. Acta Medica Leopoliensia, 27(3-4), 9-25. https://doi.org/10.25040/aml2021.3-4.009